Background: Effective solid waste management is central to environmental protection and public health. In India, despite nationwide efforts like the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, improper disposal and lack of awareness continue to challenge sustainable sanitation goals, particularly in geographically diverse regions such as Himachal Pradesh. This study aimed to evaluate public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding solid waste disposal and sanitation practices. Materials and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional online survey was conducted from January to March 2025 among 430 adult residents across rural and urban Himachal Pradesh. Using a structured bilingual questionnaire, data were collected on socio-demographics, knowledge of waste segregation and recycling, and attitudes toward environmental sanitation. Knowledge scores were categorized into four levels: Very Good (≥80%), Good (60–79%), Fair (40–59%), and Poor (<40%). Data were analyzed using SPSS v26. Results: The majority of respondents (76.7%) demonstrated good or very good awareness, particularly regarding waste segregation, bin color codes, and the harmful effects of plastic burning. However, misconceptions persisted around sanitary waste disposal, methane emissions from organic waste, and e-waste classification. Urban residents and individuals with higher education showed greater knowledge. While 44.6% scored in the "Good" category, 18.4% and 4.9% fell under “Fair” and “Poor” respectively, highlighting the need for enhanced education, especially in rural areas. Conclusion: Public awareness of solid waste management in Himachal Pradesh is growing but remains uneven. To bridge existing gaps, community-based education, sustained behavioral campaigns, and localized waste management strategies are essential. Encouraging collective responsibility and informed participation will be key to achieving long-term environmental sustainability.
Solid waste management remains one of the most critical yet overlooked pillars of environmental and public health in India. The rapid pace of urbanization, growing consumerism, and inadequate waste segregation practices have contributed to severe waste management challenges, especially in hilly states like Himachal Pradesh. Poor waste disposal not only pollutes natural resources and degrades ecosystems but also fosters the spread of diseases and compromises overall community well-being. The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India Mission), launched in 2014, brought sanitation and cleanliness to the forefront of national consciousness. However, gaps between awareness and sustainable action persist at the grassroots level [1-4]
In the context of Himachal Pradesh, the terrain itself poses unique logistical and infrastructural challenges to effective solid waste collection, segregation, and disposal. Despite commendable strides in rural sanitation and increasing urban waste collection coverage, public understanding of waste classification, recycling practices, and the long-term environmental consequences of improper waste disposal remains inconsistent. Cultural norms, lack of civic education, and limited municipal enforcement further exacerbate the issue [5,6].
The role of community engagement, environmental education, and behavioral change communication is essential in addressing these challenges. Individuals must be informed not just about “what” needs to be done (e.g., segregating dry and wet waste), but also “why” it matters (e.g., preventing groundwater contamination, improving air quality). Understanding attitudes toward waste disposal, participation in cleanliness drives, and the perceived responsibility for maintaining sanitation are crucial for designing effective interventions [7,8].
This study was undertaken to assess the level of public awareness, knowledge, and attitudes toward solid waste disposal and sanitation practices in Himachal Pradesh. It aimed to identify demographic disparities in understanding, explore behavioral patterns, and evaluate the community’s alignment with the goals of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan and sustainable waste management.
Study Design
A descriptive, cross-sectional, community-based online survey was conducted to evaluate public awareness, perceptions, and practices related to solid waste disposal and sanitation among the residents of Himachal Pradesh.
Study Population and Area
The target population included adult residents (aged 18 years and above) from rural, semi-urban, and urban regions across Himachal Pradesh. Efforts were made to ensure inclusive representation based on age, gender, education, and occupation.
Study Duration
The survey was conducted over a period of three months, from January to March 2025.
Sample Size and Sampling Technique
Assuming a 50% awareness rate of waste disposal practices (due to limited region-specific data), and a 95% confidence level with a 5% margin of error, the minimum sample size was calculated to be 384. To account for incomplete responses, the target sample size was increased to 430. Convenience sampling was employed, with digital dissemination of the survey via social media, WhatsApp, local community groups, and NGOs involved in sanitation advocacy.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion: Residents of Himachal Pradesh aged 18+, able to read Hindi or English, and willing to provide informed electronic consent
Exclusion: Incomplete responses, non-residents, and those under 18 years of age
Data Collection Tool
A structured, bilingual (Hindi and English) questionnaire was administered through Google Forms. It included:
Socio-demographic details
Knowledge and awareness of solid waste management and sanitation (20 MCQs)
Attitudes and behaviors toward waste disposal and environmental responsibility
Scoring and Categorization
Each correct response was awarded 1 point, incorrect or “don’t know” responses were scored 0. Total scores were classified as:
Very Good: ≥80%
Good: 60–79%
Fair: 40–59%
Poor: <40%
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics were used to present demographic distributions, frequencies, and percentages for knowledge levels and responses.
The study included 430 respondents, with a wide representation across age, gender, and location. A majority were aged 18–25 (41.2%) and female (58.1%). Educational attainment was relatively high, with over 70% completing secondary or higher education. Rural respondents made up 44.2% of the sample, enabling meaningful comparisons across settings.
Table 1: socio-demographic characteristics of participants
Variable | Category | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
Age Group | 18–25 | 177 | 41.2 |
26–35 | 143 | 33.3 | |
36–45 | 71 | 16.5 | |
>45 | 39 | 9.0 | |
Gender | Female | 250 | 58.1 |
Male | 180 | 41.9 | |
Education Level | No formal education | 28 | 6.5 |
Primary school | 45 | 10.5 | |
Secondary school | 166 | 38.6 | |
Undergraduate degree | 129 | 30.0 | |
Postgraduate degree | 62 | 14.4 | |
Occupation | Homemaker | 120 | 27.9 |
Government employee | 66 | 15.3 | |
Private sector | 88 | 20.5 | |
Self-employed | 74 | 17.2 | |
Student/Other | 82 | 19.1 | |
Residence | Urban | 240 | 55.8 |
Rural | 190 | 44.2 |
The questionnaire focused on real-world, relevant aspects of waste disposal including segregation, environmental impacts, recycling, and Swachh Bharat goals. The questions aimed to reflect both foundational and practical knowledge.
Table 2: awareness and knowledge of solid waste and sanitation practices
No. | Question | Options | Correct (n) | % |
1 | What is the most effective first step in solid waste management? | a) Burning, b) Segregation, c) Dumping, d) Composting | 356 | 82.8 |
2 | What color bin is typically used for biodegradable waste in India? | a) Blue, b) Green, c) Yellow, d) Red | 369 | 85.8 |
3 | What is the correct meaning of "Swachh Bharat Abhiyan"? | a) Toilet subsidy, b) Clean India Mission, c) Water project, d) Rural fund | 350 | 81.4 |
4 | Which type of waste should go into a blue bin? | a) Food scraps, b) Plastics and dry waste, c) Leaves, d) Wet cloth | 312 | 72.6 |
5 | Can improper waste disposal contaminate groundwater? | a) No, b) Only plastic, c) Yes, d) Only in cities | 341 | 79.3 |
6 | What does composting do? | a) Burns waste, b) Stores waste, c) Converts organic waste to manure, d) Disinfects garbage | 318 | 74.0 |
7 | Is burning plastic safe for the environment? | a) Yes, b) No, c) In winter only, d) With water | 377 | 87.7 |
8 | What is e-waste? | a) Kitchen waste, b) Wastewater, c) Electronic waste, d) Farm residue | 331 | 77.0 |
9 | Who is responsible for managing household waste? | a) Municipality alone, b) NGOs, c) Every citizen, d) Sweepers only | 366 | 85.1 |
10 | What is the best way to handle used sanitary napkins? | a) Flush, b) Wrap & bin, c) Burn in kitchen, d) Compost | 287 | 66.7 |
11 | What is the impact of open dumping on animals? | a) None, b) Toxicity and choking, c) Strengthens immunity, d) Fertilizer | 309 | 71.9 |
12 | Can recycling reduce the need for raw materials? | a) No, b) Not significantly, c) Yes, d) Only in factories | 324 | 75.3 |
13 | Which gas is released from decomposing organic waste? | a) Oxygen, b) Carbon monoxide, c) Methane, d) Nitrogen | 285 | 66.3 |
14 | What is the major challenge in rural waste management? | a) Waste generation, b) Collection and awareness, c) Technology, d) Climate | 299 | 69.5 |
15 | Which of the following is a recyclable item? | a) Soiled tissue, b) Cardboard, c) Leftover curry, d) Plastic bags with food | 317 | 73.7 |
16 | How often should dry and wet waste be collected separately? | a) Once a week, b) Daily, c) Monthly, d) After festivals | 308 | 71.6 |
17 | Do community cleanliness drives impact waste awareness? | a) No, b) Rarely, c) Yes, d) Only in cities | 333 | 77.4 |
18 | Is incineration a recommended method for daily household waste? | a) No, b) Yes, c) Sometimes, d) Only in monsoon | 296 | 68.8 |
19 | Which is the most sustainable household waste practice? | a) Storing indoors, b) Ignoring, c) Segregation & composting, d) Burning | 348 | 80.9 |
20 | Best way to educate public about waste management? | a) WhatsApp, b) Posters, c) Demonstrations & campaigns, d) Songs only | 359 | 83.5 |
A large majority (76.7%) of participants were classified in the "Very Good" or "Good" knowledge categories. However, the presence of 18.4% with only fair knowledge, and 4.9% with poor understanding, highlights the need for enhanced awareness campaigns, especially in rural and less-educated segments.
Table 3: knowledge score classification
Knowledge Category | Score Range | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
Very Good | ≥80% | 138 | 32.1 |
Good | 60–79% | 192 | 44.6 |
Fair | 40–59% | 79 | 18.4 |
Poor | <40% | 21 | 4.9 |
The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the current state of public awareness and behavioral attitudes toward solid waste management and sanitation in Himachal Pradesh. The high participation of young adults (41.2% aged 18–25) is particularly significant, as this demographic is both the most adaptable to behavioral change and the most likely to drive future environmental advocacy. With females comprising a larger proportion of respondents (58.1%), the study also reflects the important role that women, especially homemakers, play in managing household-level waste and promoting hygiene practices.
Encouragingly, a large majority of participants demonstrated a sound understanding of key aspects of waste segregation and environmental impact. Over 80% correctly identified segregation as the first step in effective waste management and were familiar with basic bin color coding and the objectives of the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Knowledge about the hazards of plastic burning, the environmental benefits of composting, and the dangers of open dumping was also relatively strong, reflecting the effectiveness of recent national and regional awareness campaigns.
However, certain knowledge gaps remain. Only 66.7% of respondents knew the proper disposal method for used sanitary napkins, and less than 70% were aware of methane release from decomposing organic matter. These gaps suggest a need for more comprehensive education on nuanced topics such as menstrual waste management, rural composting methods, and the health-environment linkages of improper disposal. Furthermore, misconceptions about incineration, e-waste, and rural waste challenges indicate the need for contextualized environmental education that addresses local realities.
The classification of knowledge scores showed that while a combined 76.7% of respondents had "Good" or "Very Good" awareness, a significant minority—23.3%—still fell into the "Fair" or "Poor" categories. This disparity was more pronounced among those with lower education levels and in rural settings, pointing to inequitable access to information. These findings suggest that while awareness campaigns have been successful in urban and semi-urban areas, rural communities require more sustained and inclusive outreach efforts, potentially through schools, self-help groups, and Panchayati Raj institutions.
The results also underscore the importance of community-driven waste initiatives. Respondents widely recognized the role of cleanliness drives and public demonstrations in boosting awareness. This supports the argument that decentralized, participatory waste management programs—tailored to local culture and geography—can bridge knowledge gaps and inspire long-term behavior change. To sustain momentum, waste management must be reframed not just as a civic responsibility but as a shared environmental and health imperative [3,4,7].
This study highlights that while awareness regarding solid waste disposal and sanitation practices in Himachal Pradesh has notably improved, substantial disparities persist in knowledge depth and behavioral adoption across different demographics. Urban and educated respondents displayed higher awareness levels, while rural and less-educated groups showed a greater need for targeted interventions. Overall, while the community exhibits a growing willingness to engage with waste management goals under the Swachh Bharat framework, efforts must be strengthened through localized education, participatory approaches, and consistent public engagement to foster a truly sustainable and environmentally responsible culture.
Sultana S., et al. "Awareness and Practice on Household Solid Waste Management among the Community People." Open Journal of Nursing, vol. 11, 2021, pp. 349–366.
Eshwari, K., et al. "Knowledge, Attitude and Practices towards Household Solid Waste Management among Semi-Urban Residents—A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study from Southern Part of Coastal Karnataka, India." Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, vol. 10, no. 9, 2019, p. 385. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02457.4.
Jerath N., "Awareness and Attitude of Students towards Municipal Solid Waste Management to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals – A Case Study." International Journal of Polity and Environment, vol. 7, no. 1, 15 Apr. 2021, pp. 78–85. Accessed 1 May 2025.
Debrah JK., et al. "Raising Awareness on Solid Waste Management through Formal Education for Sustainability: A Developing Countries Evidence Review." Recycling, vol. 6, no. 1, 2021, article 6.
Eshete H., et al. "Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Household Solid Waste Management and Associated Factors in Gelemso Town, Ethiopia." PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 2, 2023, e0278181.
Fadhullah W., et al. "Household Solid Waste Management Practices and Perceptions among Residents in the East Coast of Malaysia." BMC Public Health, vol. 22, no. 1, 2022, article 1.
Noonhiyil Kaithery N., et al. "A Study on Awareness of Household Waste Management in a Rural Area of Northern Kerala." International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, vol. 11, no. 9, 2024, pp. 3528–3536.
Jampala MB., and ShivnaniT., "Investigating Behavior, Attitude and Intention towards Waste Segregation in Tier II Cities of India Using Theory of Planned Behavior." Clean Waste Systems, vol. 9, 2024, article 100188.